It also claims the project was previously viewed as “not economical,” but provides no clear attribution, timing, or supporting data
Only a headline-style snippet is available; key verification details (revenue recognition basis, time period, scope of business) appear to be missing
If true, the figure could imply a major sales (or order/transaction) ramp, potentially pulling attention toward supply-chain, regional development, or infrastructure-linked themes
This is unverified market chatter without an official filing or release; confirmation from disclosures, press releases, or audited documents is needed